In the present study, patients are assessed for depression and albumin at two time points separated by 6 months, making it possible to evaluate the causal nexus: does depression at Time I predict changes in albumin between Time I and Time 2 and/or does albumin at Time I predict changes in depression from Time I to Time 2, controlling for disease severity?
Patients and methods
Subjects
All data were collected on 72 ESRD patients (32 hemodialysis and 40 peritoneal dialysis, 43 men and 29 women). The average age was 54 years (range 22 84 years), and the average time on dialysis was 3.5 years. Sixty-four percent of the patients were married, and 83% were white. Albumin and disease severity and depression scores were available for all subjects at Time I and Time 2 with the exception that only depression scores were available at Time 2 for 54 patients. Depression was assessed by two graduate students and disease severity by two nephrologists, who were unaware of the purpose of the study.
Measures
In this prospective study, 72 ESRD patients were assessed for albumin and depression at two time points separated by 6 months.
Depression
The Bill is a widely used scale to assess depression ( II ). Scores were available for 72 patients at Time I and 54 patients at Time 2. For the purposes of this study three scores were generated: the total Bill (BillTOT) score (23 items), the BDI cognitive (BillCOG) subscore ( 15 items), and the Bill somatic (BillSOM) subscore (5 items; changes in appetite, sleep, activity, etc.). The cognitive subscale has been shown to accurately assess depression in ESRD patients by excluding the somatic items, which may also be influenced by ESRD.
Disease severity
Disease severity was assessed by the ESRD Disease Severity Index (10,12) and the Kamofsky Performance Status Scale Index (13). The ESRD Disease Severity Index consists of II items representing disease categories commonly observed in patients with ESRD.
Albumin
Albumin was assessed by averaging three measures of albumin levels at two time points separated by 6 months. These scores were collected concurrently with the assessment of depression.
Results
Hierarchical regressions were used to test whether the data matched Model A or Model B. In order to test Model A, three hierarchical regressions were conducted for each depression measure ( total, cognitive, and somatic). In these hierarchical analyses, albumin at Time I, disease severity, and functional status were entered in the first step as control variables, and one of the three depression measures in the second step to predict albumin at Time 2. They test whether depression predicts changes in albumin levels between Time I and Time 2. Results of all three regressions indicate that BillTOT (/3 = -0.22; p < 0.002), BillCOG (/3 = -0.17;p < 0.015), and BillSOM (/3 = -0.23; p < 0.002) all predicted albumin at Time 2.
In order to test Model B, the reverse hierarchical regressions were conducted. In these analyses, the specific measure of depression was entered with disease severity and functional status in the first step, and Time I albumin in the second step, to predict depression at Time 2. In all cases, the results showed that albumin at Time I did not predict changes in depression for BillTOT (/3 = -0.04, p < 0.738), BillCOG (/3 = -0.08, p < 0.375), or BillSOM (/3 = -O.07,p < 0.618).
In summary, results indicate that depression at Time I predicted changes in albumin across time, but albumin did not predict changes in depression.
Discussion
The results of the present study suggest that the causal relation between albumin and depression is such that depression results in decreased albumin rather than the reverse, that poor nutritional status (low albumin) results in increases in depression. The separation of the Bill into its psychological and somatic components confirms this analysis. The subscale score with the psychological items from the Bill predict changes in albumin as well as the somatic items. This is important, since the somatic items of the BDl, in the case of ESRD, overlap with uremia and may not unambiguously reflect depression in renal patients. Thus the findings on the psychological BDl subscale, together with our controlling for disease severity, underscore that it is depression rather than disease factors that is related to poor nutritional status. Future research is needed to investigate whether albumin moderates or mediates a possible relation between depression and mortality.
One implication of these results is that the relationship between depression and poor nutritional status in ESRD patients should be taken more seriously. ESRD patients can be easily assessed for depression and albumin scores monitored to observe any reduction in nutritional status. If this should be the case, the patients , psychological status may need to be addressed.
References
- Lowrie Eo, Lew NL. Death risk in hemodialysis patients: The predictive value of commonly measured variables and an evaluation of death rate differences between facilities. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 11:254-9.
- USRDS Annual Data Report. Comorbid conditions and correlations with mortality risk among 3399 incident hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1992; 20(Suppl 2):32-8.
- Hutchinson TA, Thomas DC, Macoibbon B. Predicting survival in adults with end-stage renal disease: An age equivalent index. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96:417-23.
- Peterson RA, Kimmel PL, Sacks CR, Mesquita ML, Simmens SJ, Reiss D. Depression, perception of illness and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. Int J Psychiatry Med 1991; 21:343-54.
- Burton HJ, Kline SA, Lindsay RM, Heidenheirn PA. The relationship of depression to survival in chronic renal failure. Psychosorn Med 1986; 48:261-9.
- Friend R, Singletary Y, Mendell N, Nurse H. Group participation and survival among patients with end stage renal disease. Am J Public Health 1986; 76:670-2.
- Devins oM, Mann J, Mandin H, et al. Psychosocial predictors of survival in end-stage renal disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990; 178:127-33.
- Husebye Do, Westlie L, Styrovosky TJ, Kjellstrand CM. Psychological, social, and somatic prognostic indicators in old patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147:1921-4.
- Christensen AJ, Wiebe JS, Smith TW, Turner CW. Predictors of survival among hemodialysis patients: Effect of perceived family support. Health Psychol 1994; 13(6):521-5.
- Griffin KW, Friend R, Wadhwa NK. Measuring disease severity in patients with end-stage renal disease: Validity of the Craven et al. ESRD Severity Index. Psychol Med 1995; 25:189-93.
- Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561-71.
- Craven J, Littlefield C, Rodin G, Murray M. The End-stage Renal Disease Severity Index (ESRD-SI). Psychol Med 1991; 21:237-43.
- Mor V, Laliberte L, Morris IN, Wiemann M. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer 1984; 53:2002-7.
Corresponding author:
Nand K. Wadhwa, MD, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, HSC, T -15, Room 020, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8152 U.S.A.